<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Long Beach Criminal Defense Attorney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM</link>
	<description>Long Beach Criminal Defense Atttorney Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Cambridge Couple Are Arrested For Federal Crimes Of Espionage</title>
		<link>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/cambridge-couple-are-arrested-for-federal-crimes-of-espionage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/cambridge-couple-are-arrested-for-federal-crimes-of-espionage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home page slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kreatified.com/test/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cambridge Couple Are Arrested For Federal Crimes Of Espionage Boston Herald columnist Howie Carr is having a field day on this one. Who can blame him?: The surface-layer ironies here are numerous! “Hey”, he muses, “they don’t call it the Red Line for nothing.” The rollicking news that some Cambridge residents have been arrested and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/cambridge-couple-are-arrested-for-federal-crimes-of-espionage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Mayor Offers Strict Gun Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/chicago-mayor-offers-strict-gun-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/chicago-mayor-offers-strict-gun-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[home page slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kreatified.com/test/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Chicago Mayor Offers Strict Gun Rules&#8221; This A.P. story is on the website of the New York Times: CHICAGO (AP) &#8212; With the city&#8217;s gun ban certain to be overturned, Mayor Richard Daley on Thursday introduced what city officials say is the strictest handgun ordinance in the United States. The measure, which draws from ordinances [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/chicago-mayor-offers-strict-gun-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinion striking down Chicago handgun ban</title>
		<link>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/opinion-striking-down-chicago-handgun-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/opinion-striking-down-chicago-handgun-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kreatified.com/test/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opinion striking down Chicago handgun ban McDonald v. City of Chicago is here. Here is the syllabus: Two years ago, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. ___, this Court held that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense and struck down a District [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/opinion-striking-down-chicago-handgun-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilz on Experimental Examination of the Exclusionary Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/bilz-on-experimental-examination-of-the-exclusionary-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/bilz-on-experimental-examination-of-the-exclusionary-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kreatified.com/test/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bilz on Experimental Examination of the Exclusionary Rule Kenworthey Bilz (Northwestern University &#8211; School of Law) has posted Dirty Hands or Deterrence? An Experimental Examination of the Exclusionary Rule on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Historically, the Supreme Court has offered two justifications for the Exclusionary Rule: one, it protects the integrity of the judicial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/bilz-on-experimental-examination-of-the-exclusionary-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Berghuis v. Thompkins- Speak Now or Forever Waive Your Right to Silence?</title>
		<link>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/berghuis-v.-thompkins-speak-now-or-forever-waive-your-right-to-silence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/berghuis-v.-thompkins-speak-now-or-forever-waive-your-right-to-silence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kreatified.com/test/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Berghuis v. Thompkins- Speak Now or Forever Waive Your Right to Silence? In Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court (by a 5-4 vote) continued to tinker with its Miranda decision with the gusto of a model train enthusiast who gets a new layout part. In this latest case, the Court made it a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/berghuis-v.-thompkins-speak-now-or-forever-waive-your-right-to-silence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug Case Dismissed After Police Illegally Enter Suspect&#8217;s Home</title>
		<link>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/drug-case-dismissed-after-police-illegally-enter-suspects-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/drug-case-dismissed-after-police-illegally-enter-suspects-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kreatified.com/test/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drug Case Dismissed After Police Illegally Enter Suspect&#8217;s Home In a recent trafficking in cocaine case that occurred south of Jacksonville, Florida, the criminal case was dismissed after the court found that the drugs were illegally seized when the police entered the defendant&#8217;s home without consent, a search warrant or exigent circumstances. In order for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.CRIMINALATTORNEYLONGBEACH.COM/drug-case-dismissed-after-police-illegally-enter-suspects-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
